Skip to main content
HomeTopicsAI Security

AI Security

We've curated 152 cybersecurity statistics about AI security to help you understand how AI is being used to detect threats, enhance defenses, and even automate responses in the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity in 2025.

Showing 1-20 of 152 results

85% of security and IT leaders identify security incidents, data exposures, or near misses where the root cause is an AI system.

ExtraHop6/28/2026
Data ExposureCyber Incident

42% of security professionals plan to increase human-led red team operations.

Cobalt6/28/2026
Red TeamingOffensive Security

60% of security professionals state they require stronger LLM testing capabilities.

Cobalt6/28/2026
LLM TestingOffensive Security

32% of AI-related pentest findings were classified as high risk, compared to 12% of all pentest findings overall.

Cobalt6/28/2026
Pen TestingRisk Classification

77% of organizations conduct regular security assessments and pentests for AI-powered products, an increase of 11 percentage points from last year.

Cobalt6/28/2026
Pen TestingSecurity Assessments

The meantime to resolve (MTTR) for AI/LLM security issues is 36 days, up from 19 days in 2025.

Cobalt6/28/2026
Incident ResponseMTTR

82% of security professionals report that their teams are dedicating significantly more effort into AI security initiatives.

Cobalt6/28/2026

38% of LLM vulnerabilities were fixed while 62% remain open.

Cobalt6/28/2026
Vulnerability ManagementLLM Vulnerabilities

55% of security and IT leaders cite AI agents, agentic infrastructure, and Gen AI applications as the biggest cybersecurity risk to their organization.

ExtraHop6/28/2026
Agentic InfrastructureCyber Risk

36% of security and IT leaders identify third-party vendor or supply chain breaches involving integrated AI or agents as security incidents tied to AI systems.

ExtraHop6/28/2026
Supply Chain

38% of security and IT leaders identify compromised AI identity and session theft as security incidents tied to AI systems.

ExtraHop6/28/2026
Identity TheftSession Theft

30% of security and IT leaders report AI-generated alerts produce false positives that negatively impact investigation timelines.

ExtraHop6/28/2026
False PositivesInvestigation

Among organizations with confirmed AI-related security incidents, Shadow AI contributed to 44% of incidents, data or model poisoning 41%, improper output handling 41%, supply chain vulnerabilities 35%, and prompt injection 34%.

Cobalt6/28/2026
Attack VectorsSupply Chain

42% of U.S. mid-market enterprise IT leaders reported a confirmed AI-related security incident or exposure in the past 12 months.

Netrio6/20/2026
Incident ReportingMid-market

31% of U.S. mid-market enterprise IT leaders reported an AI-related near-miss in the past 12 months.

Netrio6/20/2026
Mid-marketUS

Roughly 73% of U.S. mid-market enterprise IT leaders have either confirmed an AI-related security incident or experienced a near-miss in the past 12 months.

Netrio6/20/2026
Mid-marketUS

83% confirmed incident rate for organizations using multi-tenant SaaS identity platforms.

FusionAuth6/15/2026
Identity PlatformsSaaS

30% of development professionals believe the same AI model that generated the code should also review it for security issues.

Black Duck6/15/2026
Software DevelopmentAI Coding Assistants

65% of organizations experienced a confirmed AI identity-related security incident in the past 12 months.

FusionAuth6/15/2026
Identity ManagementAI Identity-Related Security Incident

80% of organizations report shadow AI (employees connecting AI tools without security or IT review).

FusionAuth6/15/2026
Shadow AIInsider Risk