Only 11% of people critically analyse the source and context of information to determine if it’s a deepfake.

February 1, 2025

Only 11% of people critically analyse the source and context of information to determine if it’s a deepfake. — This cybersecurity statistic was published by iProov in February 2025. The original data appears in iProov Study Reveals Deepfake Blindspot. For the full methodology and detailed findings, refer to the original report.

Source

View Original Report

Published on 2/1/2025

Share or Copy this stat

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this statistic say?

Only 11% of people critically analyse the source and context of information to determine if it’s a deepfake. This data was published by iProov.

Where does this data come from?

This statistic comes from iProov Study Reveals Deepfake Blindspot, published by iProov on February 1, 2025. You can view the original report at https://www.iproov.com/press/study-reveals-deepfake-blindspot-detect-ai-generated-content.

What cybersecurity topics does this cover?

This statistic was published by iProov. Browse more statistics from iProov.

CYBERSTATS

Only 11% of people critically analyse the source and context of information to determine if it’s a deepfake.

Source

Share or Copy this stat

Frequently Asked Questions

Want More Statistics Like This?

Related Statistics

Face Swap attacks surged 300% compared to 2023, with threat actors focusing on systems using liveness detection protocols.

48% of people don’t know how to report deepfakes.

Just one in four search for alternative information sources if they suspect a deepfake.

49% of people trust social media less after learning about deepfakes.

There was a 704% increase in face swaps (a type of deepfake).

Deepfake videos are more challenging to identify than deepfake images; participants were 36% less likely to correctly identify a synthetic video compared to a synthetic image.

Stay Ahead of Cyber Threats